From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue May 5 18:48:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA00342 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 18:48:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA00257; Tue, 5 May 1998 18:47:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA21465; Tue, 5 May 1998 18:47:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) cc: Bruce Evans , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, xcejka00@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz Subject: Re: bin/6522 In-reply-to: Your message of "05 May 1998 20:59:20 +0200." Date: Tue, 05 May 1998 18:47:39 -0700 Message-ID: <21461.894419259@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Jordan, this is a trivial fix for a stupid (no offense) oversight. I > don't really see a reason *not* to commit it. The current behavior of > 'kbdcontrol -l glorb' is: I don't care deeply about it either way, I just think that compiled-in paths are evil and to be avoided whenever possible since they only bite you later when you move things and then have n dangling dependencies to track down. However, I'm certainly not going to argue any more about it considering the extreme triviality involved so do whatever you like - it's unimportant. :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message