From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 14 09:30:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A48816A403 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F7943D7B for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:30:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GjucU-0008Vc-PL for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:30:19 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:30:18 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:30:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:30:06 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <1163442609.10865.59.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> <20061113191454.GB66013@rambler-co.ru> <1163455070.14157.9.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> <20061113223904.GB84153@rambler-co.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060625) In-Reply-To: <20061113223904.GB84153@rambler-co.ru> Sender: news Subject: Re: 6.1 with PAE on a recent server (HP DL380 G5 or Dell PE 1950) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:30:23 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:57:50PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote: >> Will the systems be quicker this way, or will it "just" help >> with this 4GB memory limit? >> > Quicker - probably not. Will certainly help with the 4G limit. On a low level sort of way amd64 actually might be quicker than PAE since AFAIK PAE introduces nontrivial kernel overhead to get to the "extra" memory.