From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 25 17:11:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA28726 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 17:11:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA28706 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 17:11:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA15457; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 17:08:28 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703260108.RAA15457@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" cc: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert), jfieber@indiana.edu, langfod@dihelix.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cool Web page interface to mail + search engine? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Mar 1997 16:58:09 PST." <199703260058.QAA27769@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 17:08:27 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk It is just a distraction from Terry for now just ignore it and concentrate on the real project . Amancio >From The Desk Of "Jonathan M. Bresler" : > Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > How can I reply to a message with a date stamp earlier than the > > original message? > > > > It seems to me that threading would be implicit. > > ordering != threading > ordering is less restrictive relationship > > has anything useful come out of this thread? > > well, i checked rfc822, 1122 and 1123, Message-ID header > is not required. if not presendt, the sendmail on freefall > will add it. same is true of the date. (in reality these > depend upon the M and D flags for the mailer, but all > mailers on freefall have these flags set) > > regarding the Message-ID header, Bryan Costales writes: > "This header must be declared in the configuration file." > wonder where this requirement is laid down? > jmb