Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 14:51:01 +0200 From: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> To: clefevre@citeweb.net Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [Patch] make test,expr,printf support 64bit integers Message-ID: <20000708145101.A3242@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <zonwi0pn.fsf@pc166.gits.fr>; from clefevre@no-spam.citeweb.net on Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 02:03:48AM %2B0200 References: <20000703184219.A7587@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> <zonwi0pn.fsf@pc166.gits.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2000-07-06 02:03 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@no-spam.citeweb.net> wrote: > > -static int getlong __P((long *)); > > +static int getlong __P((quad_t *)); > ^^^^^^^ getquad > > if (getlong(&val)) > ^^^^^^^ getquad > IMHO, be consistent w/ naming convention (getlong -> getquad). Thanks for your comment! Yes, you are of course right. I remember to have considered changing the name to match the type, but for reasons I can't remember decided against this. (Probably because I wanted to restrict the patch to just the functional changes.) I'll change the ifunction name as you propose. If there are no other comments or requests for further changes, I'll commit the 64Bit extension on Sunday or Monday. Regards, STefan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000708145101.A3242>