From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 06:16:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F016016A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFF443FE5 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:16:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D5E5482B; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:16:31 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9F57E6D455; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:16:31 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:16:31 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <20031201141631.GB99428@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Matthias Andree , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20031125025621.453732A8FC@canning.wemm.org> <200311250311.hAP3BTCO075916@apollo.backplane.com> <20031125150700.GA48007@madman.celabo.org> <20031125201421.GB54467@madman.celabo.org> <200311252039.hAPKdBfq080963@apollo.backplane.com> <20031126130402.GB57523@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:16:39 -0000 On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 02:01:02PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: > > NSS and PAM do not overlap. > > I wonder how PAM gets "system" authentication information for pam_pwdb > or pam_unix or how it's called today and on the pertinent system if not > through NSS. Reimplementation of these "passwd/shadow/whatever" > mechanisms? No, PAM uses the system directory services APIs (e.g. getpwnam(3) and similar). Those in turn use NSS, on NSS systems. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine NTT/Verio SME FreeBSD UNIX Heimdal nectar@celabo.org jvidrine@verio.net nectar@freebsd.org nectar@kth.se