Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:36:26 -0800
From:      Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        threads@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS port and thread_exit()
Message-ID:  <20150228073625.GA2627@raichu>
In-Reply-To: <20150228043144.GQ2379@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <20150228043144.GQ2379@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:31:44AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> While looking for some change to thread_exit(), I noted that ZFS
> on FreeBSD directly calls thread_exit(). It simply cannot work,
> thread_exit() is the internal function which requires the thread and
> process state prepared for it call. Among most obvious things, process
> spin lock must be held, but also several cleanups and accounting have to
> be done before the call.
> 
> I believe the function just happens to have the same name as the Solaris
> counterpart, and for some reasons it is never called. If this is true,
> kthread_exit() should be used instead.

I'm not very familiar with the ZFS code, but:

The opensolaris compat proc.h #defines thread_exit to kthread_exit after
FreeBSD's proc.h is included, so calls to thread_exit() in ZFS code should
be replaced. Also, zfs.ko contains no references to thread_exit, but does
reference kthread_exit.

> 
> Also, I noted that the userspace port defines thread_exit() as
> thr_exit(NULL). Again, the direct invocation of the syscall does not
> look right. The libthr library must do some cleanups on the thread exit,
> which are not done if syscall is invoked by an application code. Also,
> the thread itself gets no destructor calls.

This is done in zfs_context.h, which includes
cddl/contrib/opensolaris/head/thread.h, which #defines thr_exit(r) to
pthread_exit(r). There is no other thread.h in the src tree, and
libzpool.so references only pthread_exit. So it seems to me that the
compat layer is doing the right thing.

> 
> Could somebody interested in ZFS look into the issues ?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150228073625.GA2627>