From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 25 16:52:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDE037B424 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slave (Studded@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA10849; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:52:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:52:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n37.san.rr.com To: Krzysztof Parzyszek Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Load averages In-Reply-To: <20000925183854.A10200@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 03:47:00PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote: > > > > > I cvsupped the whole system on Sunday. Now for idle system, uptime > > > shows load averages of 1.00. Before update it showed load avg's of 0.00. > > Seems like stable to me... Yup. There are some issues with load average in -current right now related to the SMPng code that produce the same symptoms, which is why I mentioned it. So now the question is, what do tools like top, ps, systat, etc. say? Doug -- "The dead cannot be seduced." - Kai, "Lexx" Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message