From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 20:29:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55C1106564A for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:29:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from kientzle.com (kientzle.com [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C55B8FC0A for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:29:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.123.2.23] (h-66-166-149-52.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.149.52]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n1OKSnFg004348; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:28:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <49A458BF.8090603@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:29:51 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Rodrigues References: <1235502625.4345.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090224192950.GA93786@crodrigues.org> In-Reply-To: <20090224192950.GA93786@crodrigues.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sean Bruno , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Default FS Layout Too Small? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:29:46 -0000 Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:10:25AM -0800, Sean Bruno wrote: > >>I would assume that the default would be much larger now-a-days. I think >>a simple doubling to 1G would be sufficient. > > Is there any point these days to having sysinstall auto-default to creating > separate slices for /tmp, /var/, /usr........ > when setting up new systems, I've started just ignoring > the sysinstall auto-defaults and making one big / partition > and installing FreeBSD there.... > > It seems every release we need to keep bumping up the size of > the sysinstall auto-defaults because they are too small. > > This bites new users. I agree. The "one big /" style of partitioning seems a much more reasonable default for most desktop/laptop users these days. For server users, the separate /tmp and /var are pretty critical, though I doubt those folks are using the "A"uto layout very much, so changing the "A"uto layout to just allocate / and swap would seem to make sense. Tim