From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 5 15:00:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA03381 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:00:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA03373 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:00:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14569(1)>; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:59:43 PST Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177478>; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:59:41 -0800 To: Terry Lambert cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List Duplicates In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Feb 96 14:43:42 PST." <199602052243.PAA00505@phaeton.artisoft.com> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:59:40 PST From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <96Feb5.145941pst.177478@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In message <199602052243.PAA00505@phaeton.artisoft.com> you write: >Point of order: how do I tell which individual addresses in the current >headers are or are not in the list addresses also in the current headers? I will concede the potential of it being nice to have the To: or cc: lines trimmed by the mail server, although it is a relatively expensive operation, won't help people for whom multiple addresses map to one, and I sometimes *like* to be able to have a conversation "outside" the list using cc:'s; list mail comes really slowly for me. Just pointing out that different people use mailing lists differently, I guess. But if the FreeBSD lists start using Reply-To: then I will have to write some code to remove it, or something, so that I can still bear to be subscribed to them. Bill