From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 14 08:01:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6066E7; Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE151CB7; Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577B43BB88; Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4E81eQN077804; Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:41 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Ian Lepore cc: John-Mark Gurney , Adrian Chadd , Hans Petter Selasky , David Chisnall , Baptiste Daroussin , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Increase BUFSIZ to 8192 In-reply-to: <1431542835.1221.30.camel@freebsd.org> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <20150511230635.GA46991@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150512032307.GP37063@funkthat.com> <14994.1431412293@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150513080342.GE37063@funkthat.com> <55530CC3.1090204@selasky.org> <1431528249.1221.15.camel@freebsd.org> <20150513181347.GM37063@funkthat.com> <1431542835.1221.30.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <77802.1431590500.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:40 +0000 Message-ID: <77803.1431590500@critter.freebsd.dk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 08:01:43 -0000 -------- In message <1431542835.1221.30.camel@freebsd.org>, Ian Lepore writes: >On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 11:13 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >As I've already pointed out, BUFSIZ appears in the >base code over 2000 times. Where is the analysis of the impact an 8x >change is going to have on all those uses? Not to pick on Ian in particular, but I'm going to call bike-shed on this discussion now. Please just make it 4K on 32bit archs and 16K on 64 bit archs, and get on with your lives. If experience in -current (that's why developers run current, right ?!) documents that this was the wrong decision, we can revisit it. Until then: Shut up and code. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.