From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 21:50:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB49D16A4DA for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr (smtp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1F943D46 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (tataz.chchile.org [82.233.239.98]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0CA75BB1; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:50:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [192.168.1.25]) by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0739E553; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5CA3F408C; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:50:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:50:48 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20060828215048.GB15761@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: [fbsd] possible patch for implementing split DNS X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:50:19 -0000 Julian, On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 02:39:36PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > I need some processes to look elsewhere for DNS information from where > the rest > of the system looks.. This patch seems to me a simple solution. > We over-ride where the resolver looks for resolv.conf using an > environment variable. > This would allow me to reset this to an application specific config file > that > specifies a different server. I like this idea, but don't you think the administrator might want to be able to disable this functionnality for his users ? Unless using a packet filter might suffice... Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >