From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 23:05:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85F957B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:05:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from mail-ve0-f174.google.com (mail-ve0-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51271790 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c13so1197497vea.19 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:05:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wemm.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=u6/N/jyfep5sMnr0DQ0MceMzDV1IZfbn9yJNo+w/XF8=; b=NFNLPbxunkza70j+hRkylvO/91kaz6LkI0nZl/GeDOwIi1ACRQfBuqOwdiuv3snhOU lHVRNfW7kmFNb7BoO7Gv7AdTUqMm0cwEDFE9bhlTWbBNcOp+XCpFAaqcmmMrIjDMRa0h 4ZKwmJX1JnUvluwsJxJv7oV5FLx2FMnTB5XNg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=u6/N/jyfep5sMnr0DQ0MceMzDV1IZfbn9yJNo+w/XF8=; b=B32y3fFPYmYmxooIMHiFJlKSY3eS2wlKFEMUUH7p8vz2qQ9x3lxt6sJHKUqN1PkhPM mI7qkimklHWAwE8o0hFl9frvfS0mmGC9rGtfD+HHBuvqGcgcvMbvkhsg39WmOBjRANCI rQ1C+URHAdTcjZZGpLSgKmgbkPArsrxd/52IbDX+L9BRbQlboUIuX8ZAoSf02mBVa1e1 /pAvUXGT4r+NRcYxRgfq/bfaNhX6K9oJvSW2tZe6TYoI0BOFM7cSVbpptKKjwAxLSNgS Cj4prMNcfD+1A2ETKkqnds5s/oxW+xtDHT3tYHBGb7BlTFFbPKCbotmHruFSTGE84INx K1AQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.88.168 with SMTP id bh8mr2932260vdb.51.1358982316380; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:05:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.174.135 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:05:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <20130123201734.be0f9e715289c29e1b03c393@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:05:16 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? From: Peter Wemm To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkx8AYjFil0Y8WS16VlB68aMjbGX3+BS1yiOIZJxVXRoblxMdiRF5b1L/yXatoepSXdXTr Cc: Lev Serebryakov , FreeBSD , Emanuel Haupt X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:05:17 -0000 On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 23 January 2013 19:17, Emanuel Haupt wrote: >> devel/subversion already has an option to build a static version. A >> solution could be to create a stub port (devel/subversion-static) >> similar to: >> >> shells/bash-devel >> shells/bash-static-devel >> >> dns/ldns >> dns/py-ldns > > Great idea; > > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/svn-static.diff No, you completely missed the point. Its not about static linking its embedded subversion libraries. I'm complaining about things like gdbm and bdb via apr, build dependencies like both python and perl for apr, and so on. If you made a port just to turn on the static option, it is equally as fail as before. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV bitcoin:188ZjyYLFJiEheQZw4UtU27e2FMLmuRBUE