From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 10 06:18:24 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA03933 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 06:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neon.Glock.COM (neon.glock.com [198.82.228.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA03922 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 06:18:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mmead@localhost) by neon.Glock.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA00810; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 09:15:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "matthew c. mead" Message-Id: <199604101315.JAA00810@neon.Glock.COM> Subject: Re: IPX routing? To: jhay@mikom.csir.co.za (John Hay) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 09:15:06 -0400 (EDT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199604091902.VAA25752@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> from "John Hay" at Apr 9, 96 09:02:17 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk John Hay writes: > > Has anyone done any IPX routing on FreeBSD? > We are using it here at the company I work for. It is mostly the stuff in > FreeBSD-current. The main problem with it at the moment is the handling > of type 20 (Netbios) packets. I am currently testing it here and will > commit it when I am happy with that. Hmm. How feasible would it be to get that code running under 2.1.0R? If it's not very feasible I may update my proxyarp gateway box to -current since it's been pretty stable lately. The reason I want to be able to route IPX packets between interfaces is because I have two machines hanging off one 10baseT port in my apartment and want to do IPX network stuff (mainly games) with other people on the subnet in my apartment complex. -matt -- Matthew C. Mead mmead@Glock.COM http://www.Glock.COM/~mmead/