Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:25:42 +0000 From: Prafulla Deuskar <pdeuskar@freebsd.org> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: TSO patch for current Message-ID: <20060905162542.GA63869@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0609021741y481a04c0r42902166eaba78d7@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a41acea0609011551v40338539u4eef48d091dd12ab@mail.gmail.com> <44F9384C.9070902@freebsd.org> <2a41acea0609021741y481a04c0r42902166eaba78d7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jack Vogel [jfvogel@gmail.com] wrote: > On 9/2/06, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote: > > >I can't comment on the em part but the tcp_output.c stuff looks > >very much like a straight port from NetBSD. If we take code from > >the other BSDs we have to remark this in the emails we send with > >patches and the commit message (otherwise we get accused of 'stealing > >without attribution'). > > I dont know that I'd call it a straight port, rather I was working from some > prototype code that Prafulla had working back on 4.7, but I think at that > time that he may have patterned it after NetBSD. I don't think NetBSD had TSO support in 2002 when I first did the 4.7 patch for internal testing. Prafulla
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060905162542.GA63869>