From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 2 16:00:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20801456 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 16:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D081E1A32 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 16:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AB651FE02B; Fri, 2 May 2014 17:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5363C133.2000304@selasky.org> Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 18:00:51 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johny Mattsson , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB audio device on Raspberry Pi - link_elf: symbol isa_dmastatus undefined References: <20140425154430.GA76168@utility-01.thismonkey.com> <535A8AEA.1000100@selasky.org> <20140425204134.GA458@cicely7.cicely.de> <20140430091411.GA45015@utility-01.thismonkey.com> <5360C0A7.9010407@selasky.org> <1398867266.22079.51.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5362638B.1080104@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <5362638B.1080104@selasky.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 16:00:03 -0000 On 05/01/14 17:08, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 05/01/14 01:34, Johny Mattsson wrote: >> On 1 May 2014 00:14, Ian Lepore wrote: >> >>> I was doing some testing on a wandboard (about twice as fast an an rpi) >>> with >>> more than 20k int/sec without having any problems. >>> >> >> On a similar note, I've pushed an i.MX 283 (400MHz) board to above 300k >> int/sec, on Linux. Admittedly at that point my shell wasn't what you'd >> call >> "responsive" however =) The ISR in that scenario was the GPIO handler, so >> probably a bit more light-weight than an audio ISR. > > Hi, > > I'll have a look and see if I can fix it. > > --HPS Hi, Here is a patch (work in progress) which you can try: http://home.selasky.org:8192/dwc_otg_isoc_support_wip.diff Still not working 100% reliable. Trying to figure out the last bits and pieces. --HPS