From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Nov 22 16:44:18 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA00389
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:44:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA00384
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA16302; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 17:29:51 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199611230029.RAA16302@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: cdrom boot?
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 17:29:51 -0700 (MST)
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199611222311.AAA29000@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Nov 23, 96 00:11:37 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > > Isn't there unprotoize in the gcc distribution that does this?
> 
> > I think you are thinking of "protoize".  I think there might be an
> > unprotoize, but I think the idea of the GCC crowd is to move toward
> > ANSI code, not away.
> 
> Well, thinking doesn't exactly seem to be your best task these days,
> Terry? :-))
> 
> protoize(1) used to be accompanied by unprotoize(1) in the gcc
> distribution for a long time.  They use the gcc parser with a special
> shortcut that causes it to dump its internal structures in a C
> notation.

Is it *currently* accompanied by unprotoize(1)?

% man 1 unprotoize
No entry for unprotoize in section 1 of the manual


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.