From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 17 03:21:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA01085 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 03:21:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA01076 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 03:21:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA01450; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 03:19:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802171119.DAA01450@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Terry Lambert cc: Tor.Egge@idi.ntnu.no (Tor Egge), mike@smith.net.au, toor@dyson.iquest.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM messed: vm_page_free panic problem In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Feb 1998 01:56:07 GMT." <199802170156.SAA02873@usr04.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 03:19:03 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I believe -stable still uses the vn_rdwr (without the necessary call > to LEASE_CHECK, of course, the better to break NFS...). In normal > operation, this problem should never manifest in -stable. Can we have a confirmation on this, please? Tor says he's checked the source and -stable is vulnerable; you say that you don't think it is. What's reality look like? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message