From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed May 1 8:53:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C39237B405 for ; Wed, 1 May 2002 08:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caddis.yogotech.com (caddis.yogotech.com [206.127.123.130]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02069; Wed, 1 May 2002 09:53:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by caddis.yogotech.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) id g41FreCU039005; Wed, 1 May 2002 09:53:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15568.3972.195679.95790@caddis.yogotech.com> Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 09:53:40 -0600 To: John Utz Cc: Nate Williams , "M. Warner Losh" , Subject: Re: is there a technical reason for apm or pnp to NOT be klds? In-Reply-To: References: <15567.27168.230527.88559@caddis.yogotech.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > I believe John has a patch for APM that I promised to test a long time > > ago that fixes much of this. Note, if APM didn't get loaded before > > someone used the APM utility, bad things would happen, but this is no > > worse than disabling APM. > > of the many freebsd hacking Johns in the world, of which do you speak? Obviously not you. To be honest, I don't remember. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message