From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 19:15:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FFF106566B; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150C38FC19; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BABD41C730; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:00:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tROmd48uLAWT; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:00:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id DF73A41C711; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:00:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625DF4448E6; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:59:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <20090204184526.I93725@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Message-ID: <20090204185656.B93725@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <498414E5.7020904@elischer.org> <4984241B.5010103@elischer.org> <4987548A.7000609@elischer.org> <20090204184526.I93725@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Net , FreeBSD virtualization mailing list Subject: Re: Vimage globals vs structures measurements. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:15:09 -0000 On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Hi, > >> If I can get some confirmation of this by others then >> the next step would be to simply remove the VIMAGE_GLOBALS option >> and all the global variables it covers. >> >> At least that's what seems next to me.. > > no, the next step is to bring in the beaf (last step). ... beef ... anyway. The indirection, the real virtualization, the multiple images, ... you count my typos;) > I think we had clearly decided (somewhen, somewho) that we want one > version with all three options at the same time. > Once we are confident, hopefully after a few days at that point, > VIMAGE_GLOBALS will go away. > > So please do not rape that out. In two months there were no real > accidents wrt. VIMAGE_GLOBALS even with all the larger changes that > went in. I think it's safe to keep them another 4-6 weeks. > > /bz > > -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.