From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 6 10:16:41 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA02407 for current-outgoing; Thu, 6 Apr 1995 10:16:41 -0700 Received: from FirePower.COM (firepower.firepower.com [198.4.104.7]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA02400 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 1995 10:16:39 -0700 Received: from tuskppp by FirePower.COM (NX5.67d/NX4.0Mhb.0b) id AA01725; Thu, 6 Apr 95 10:15:28 -0700 Received: from rhiannon by tusk.dsms.sanmateo.ca.us (NX5.67e/NX3.0M.dsms.0.3) id AA06372; Thu, 6 Apr 95 10:15:26 -0700 Message-Id: <9504061715.AA06372@tusk.dsms.sanmateo.ca.us> Received: by rhiannon.dsms.sanmateo.ca.us (NX5.67e/NX3.0X) id AA00575; Thu, 6 Apr 95 10:15:24 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2) From: harold barker Date: Thu, 6 Apr 95 10:15:21 -0700 To: Brian Tao Subject: Re: PERL4&5 broken in -current and 950322-SNAP! Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org References: Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk When gcc 2.6.3 came out i tried to compile it on a number of our machines = (rs6k, HPUX9.5, SUN 4.1.3, NeXT 3.3/3.2) not one compile made it through = with out core dumping on libg++, so i stayed at 2.6.2. > Guess I should forward this from ports to current... apologies to > those who will be seeing this twice. > --=20 > Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao > taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org >=20 > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 1995 15:58:54 +0800 (CST) > From: Brian Tao > To: FREEBSD-PORTS-L > Subject: Perl 5.001 >=20 > Just finished building and testing perl 5.001 with all extensions > on my 950322-SNAP machine. I get the following errors running the > testsuite: >=20 > cmd/for........FAILED on test 1 > op/time........FAILED on test 5 > lib/bigint.....FAILED on test 61 > lib/bigintpm...FAILED on test 7 > Failed 4/90 tests, 95.56% okay. >=20 > None of these were present when compiled with gcc 2.6.2 on a > 950210 machine. The 2.6.2-compiled perl5 also fails now. >=20 > I noticed this when running the cmd/for test: >=20 > % /usr/local/bin/perl for.t > 1..7 > #1 :10: eq :10: > #1 :0. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10: eq :0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10: > not ok 1 > ok 2 > ok 3 > ok 4 > ok 5 > ok 6 > ok 7 >=20 > The first loop prints out a "0." instead of a "0". This anomaly > also caused gcc to fail when compiling the extension modules (because > perl was generating array subscripts with 0. instead of 0). Anyone > have a gcc 2.6.2/pre-950322 machine to test this? > --=20 > Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao > taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org >=20