From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Apr 20 08:41:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9302BB5CC for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb1-f193.google.com (mail-yb1-f193.google.com [209.85.219.193]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495KtV5jZfz3RH6; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb1-f193.google.com with SMTP id n188so4974818ybc.3; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 01:41:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q+YW0F88u2v3D2IwXSxe3XfJJx9YQETlcOXVpDViBXo=; b=PU7h2zA3UNo/+Q1DtKGLNG+20ZbOvsJVQOxvfl1lioFhtVZPxkQ+5Q65x75XNds2MZ QxQKHeVGGcchr9ZCyaTIpcqvUYfDtc97i+dUaCs4KbWQAinu/uJ+7ku1n9dcKyiFOhNL lx47oP7g6ffnE7aMv/SMQhJEsafJcHI00GuI7dccSokxg1QFTx8pW1cgho1BDYSl5oRr npdsczTJbprWSvCoZzm/gGjAAIzJrkzDJz2Kwj7z1abjwyjHClED012BAoyWkxZX/mea gfvz/NanQm9efoCEqmK3/xgkf1avvCXl54/DBwUoGJwPBvcilxmGvSdQedzBYn0FRkd0 +s0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubBRnwOoXRM0sQau81K4yjRV/AXKcMKOP6BJo98UkpdEfh9o5dl zyqA+jiRtxXzNiyzHFd/uF2ufc4eu5uQZ/Qd67yaYlLs X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLml7tRusvf8AtjHOX5EMzMuywYY+nldrrcLBxlZrSta/ymQeOULkHvihqJfiHPUj/d9TTwXOxVrbumS2aEl0U= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:283:: with SMTP id x3mr2420273ybl.497.1587372097579; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 01:41:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1587211096.573263000.1z45j66i@frv55.fwdcdn.com> <20200418142003.GA64067@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20200418150108.GA14089@lion.0xfce3.net> <20200418152152.GA64335@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20200418152152.GA64335@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Li-Wen Hsu Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:41:26 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Outdated jemalloc in CURRENT To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: Gordon Bergling , freebsd-current , Jason Evans Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 495KtV5jZfz3RH6 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.193 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[193.219.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-0.19)[ip: (-0.06), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-0.40), asn: 15169(-0.43), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[193.219.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[googlemail.com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:41:40 -0000 On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:22 PM Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 05:01:08PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 07:20:03AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 03:05:25PM +0300, nonameless@ukr.net wrote: > >>> Hi everyone! > >>> > >>> As I see, CURRENT still uses outdated jemalloc 5.1.0 with some > >>> performance regressions that was fixed in 5.2.1. > >>> > >>> Are there some issues that blocking update jemalloc to recent version? > >>> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> r354606 | jasone | 2019-11-10 21:06:49 -0800 (Sun, 10 Nov 2019) | 4 lines > >> > >> Revert r354605: Update jemalloc to version 5.2.1. > >> > >> Compilation fails for non-llvm-based platforms. > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> r354605 | jasone | 2019-11-10 19:27:14 -0800 (Sun, 10 Nov 2019) | 2 lines > >> > >> Update jemalloc to version 5.2.1. > >> > > > > I am not sure, that this info is correct. As far as I remember the > > update for jemalloc was reverted due to build problems, on some > > architecture. An updated revision has still to be commited to -CURRENT. > > > > Those two commits confirm your memory. 5.2.1 was committed > in r354605. 5.2.1 was reverted with r354606 where the reason > for reverting is stated. As 5.2.1 has not been re-committed > and there is nothing in reviews.freebsd.org for review, one > may expect the reason in r354606 still stands. > > PS: Please, do not top-post. > PPS: Please, wrap your messages to something less than 80 characters. I think it's fine to (and hope we can) update it again as the previous error was on outdated gcc which is not existing anymore: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2020-March/195013.html Li-Wen