Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:15:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Ed Maste <emaste@sandvine.com> Cc: 'Sergey Lyubka' <devnull@uptsoft.com> Subject: RE: memory mapped packet capturing - bpf replacement ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0406141014120.30464-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533701BD40C7@mail.sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Ed Maste wrote: > > > > > Now, the questions: > > 1. is my interpretation of benchmark results correct? > > 2. if they are correct, why bpf is faster? > > 3. is it OK to have no mutexes for ringbuffer operations ? > don't forget that bpf is not copying the entire packet, just the header..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0406141014120.30464-100000>