From owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 16 18:26:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BC01065820 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFF38FC18 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8GIQl1D055245; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:26:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <505619E7.8080804@missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:26:47 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <5017111E.6060003@missouri.edu> <20120814201105.T934@besplex.bde.org> <502A780B.2010106@missouri.edu> <20120815223631.N1751@besplex.bde.org> <502C0CF8.8040003@missouri.edu> <20120906221028.O1542@besplex.bde.org> <5048D00B.8010401@missouri.edu> <504D3CCD.2050006@missouri.edu> <504FF726.9060001@missouri.edu> <20120912191556.F1078@besplex.bde.org> <20120912225847.J1771@besplex.bde.org> <50511B40.3070009@missouri.edu> <20120913204808.T1964@besplex.bde.org> <5051F59C.6000603@missouri.edu> <20120914014208.I2862@besplex.bde.org> <50526050.2070303@missouri.edu> <20120914212403.H1983@besplex.bde.org> <50538E28.6050400@missouri.edu> <20120915231032.C2669@besplex.bde.org> <50548E15.3010405@missouri.edu> <5054C027.2040008@missouri.edu> <5054C200.7090307@missouri.edu> <20120916041132.D6344@besplex.bde.org> <50553424.2080902@missouri.edu> <20120916134730.Y957@besplex.bde.org> <5055ECA8.2080008@missouri.edu> <5055EE33.2090400@missouri.edu> <20120917025148.X2943@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20120917025148.X2943@besplex.bde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Complex arg-trig functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:26:50 -0000 On 09/16/2012 12:12 PM, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >> A style question: do you mind this >> >> if (sy==0) ry = copysign(ry, -1); >> if (A < 1) A = 1; >> >> or do you prefer >> >> if (sy==0) >> ry = copysign(ry, -1); >> if (A < 1) >> A = 1; > > Multiple statements per line are large style bugs, as are missing spaces > around == operators (I might agree only to omitting spaces around most > multiplication operators and some addition operators). > > Apart from being less readable, multiple statements per line break > debugging > using line-based debuggers. > > BTW, copysign() is builtin in gcc-4.2 and not broken by a macro in > . > Otherwise it would be very slow. I changed it to: if (sy==0) ry = -ry; I happen to know that ry is always positive.