Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:05:09 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: making a server entirely without X Message-ID: <20160722140509.4d58c715c8821c72b9013987@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <945bba5d-ffb4-10cb-1467-f1f7ca4d73db@zyxst.net> References: <4fe29709-c000-43ac-01c5-38b607887f19@zyxst.net> <2AE900AC-9B5D-42D4-9715-4F7A5FBA6ADA@ohlste.in> <945bba5d-ffb4-10cb-1467-f1f7ca4d73db@zyxst.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:54:49 +0100 tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> wrote: > On 22/07/2016 13:43, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > > Hello, > > > >> On Jul 22, 2016, at 8:38 AM, tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I want to build a server entirely without X. What is the incantation > >> for make.conf please? Or is it incanted elsewhere? > > > > All X components are part of the ports/pkg system. If you don't want > > them, don't install them. > > But some ports will build X (or parts of X) as dependencies. Or > dependencies on dependencies. I want to prevent that. It used to be > something like WITHOUT_X11=YES in /etc/make.conf but that was a long > time ago and I think the syntax has changed. I'm looking for the new > syntax. X11=NO should do the job AFAICT. Disclaimer - I haven't tried it, just seen that bsd.sanity.make says X11 is the replacement for WITHOUT_X11. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160722140509.4d58c715c8821c72b9013987>