Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:47:12 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Ports-options and packages Message-ID: <200302231547.16715.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_07NW+MgYQlVVsoZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline I notice that more and more ports translate build and configure options int= o=20 Makefile logic to allow ports-collection users to customize their=20 installations. While this is a good thing and helps to not inflate the=20 ports-collection, it leaves packages-users with a variety of packages which= =20 come in a rather meager default build - GUIs missing, features missing. Is= =20 there already some plan or work underway to make port-build options uniform= ,=20 so that the package-build-cluster could provide separate packages for each= =20 combination? =2D-=20 Regards, Michael Nottebrock --Boundary-02=_07NW+MgYQlVVsoZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+WN70Xhc68WspdLARAnIUAKCrlGg1TlftvHrgzGU1kzR43edWqQCfdd+9 mG8h5mDkZ5f6PuRGRHLma30= =qSK6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_07NW+MgYQlVVsoZ-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302231547.16715.michaelnottebrock>