From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Apr 26 3:27:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D81037B8C3 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 03:27:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09400 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:27:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id MAA03452 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:27:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from luna.worldonline.nl (luna.worldonline.nl [195.241.48.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D675937B72A for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 03:26:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeroen@vangelderen.org) Received: from vangelderen.org (vp210-15.worldonline.nl [195.241.210.15]) by luna.worldonline.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA08972; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:26:30 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3906C448.825BAD84@vangelderen.org> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:26:16 -0400 From: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lehey Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c) References: <20000426124729.D40207@freebie.lemis.com> <20000425234016.D1022@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000426164824.D43932@freebie.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > FOLLOWS UP DIRECTED THERE. PLEASE *REMOVE* cvs-all & cvs-committers from > > this thread. [...] > cvs-all doesn't appear to be a real mailing list, be we all know that > there are about 200 people there. That means nearly 900 people on the > (mutually exclusive) cvs lists, at least another 800 over in -current, > less than 500 in -arch. You can't force a committer to join -arch, > which is why I still prefer -committers. Correct me if I'm wrong but I have the feeling that architectural discussions are off-topic on -commits and perfectly on-topic on -arch. I have to admit that I seem unable to find a list charter for -commits but it seems unlikely that it would be the same as the charter for -arch. You surely aren't saying that you want people to post to the wrong list just because you don't feel like joining -arch? Nobody is forcing you to join -arch, but you have to if you want to have "Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture" . Keep in mind that by having architectural discussions on -commits you are annoying people that are just interested in commit msgs. Or maybe the various charters need revision? Cheers, Jeroen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message