From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jun 14 12:07:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA04144 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 14 Jun 1997 12:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA04120 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 1997 12:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA01664; Sat, 14 Jun 1997 23:06:40 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 23:06:40 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Andreas Klemm cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache port and http://www.vex.net/php/ In-Reply-To: <19970614184643.55229@klemm.gtn.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 14 Jun 1997, Andreas Klemm wrote: > Would you like to integrate it into your apache port or do you > think it's getting to complicated then ? I simple don't have a time to play with... :-) > Would you like to do the port, since you already maintain > apache or would you prefer, that I create another port like > "apache-php" ?! I think it is better if this addition will be controlled by some sort of environment variable during apache build. Separate port can be only the form picked up durign apache build, not true separate port, because true separate port makes adding of more modules harder. > We should take into consideration, that soon more apache > modules might show up ... How would you like this apache > module stuff be handeled ?! I think set of environment variables is the way to control apache soup, but maybe more nice ways exists I don't know. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/