Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 00:35:31 -0800 From: Pedro Giffuni <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> To: "Makoto MATSUSHITA (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJF4kRCQ3JD8kXiQzJEgbKEI=?=)" <matusita@ics.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fvwm2 without japanese kit Message-ID: <332BB0D3.2F7A@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> References: <199703151134.DAA01480@baloon.mimi.com> <19970316133437X.matusita@ics.es.osaka-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Makoto MATSUSHITA (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJF4kRCQ3JD8kXiQzJEgbKEI=?=) wrote: > > I'm also the maintainer of a i18n patch of fvwm. This patch is not a > japanization patch (asami-san also says so too). It is based only on > X11's internationalization framework, so all locales handled by > Operationg System should work in FreeBSD environment. > Why not eliminate all the references to the word "Japanese" (nothing personal of course)? It should be assumed that all ports work well with english unless specifically stated. Yeah I know the port COMMENT says it's not only japanese, but some people read backwards :(. > asami> I have no problem if someone wants to keep the English version > asami> up to date. > > I think so too. I'm very surprized that nobody does update plain fvwm2 > ports for several months. I think it is easy to do... > I agree; when I asked why there was so little OpenLook support, the response was "we all use fvwm since a long time". On 2.1.7 Release, none of the fvwm packages worked for me. I was going to use the newer ports, but ended using bowman and a newer port of lesstif. Pedro. > -- - > Makoto `MAR_kun' MATSUSHITA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?332BB0D3.2F7A>