From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 10 22:43:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA07809 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 22:43:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from isi.co.jp (ns [202.214.62.35] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA07804 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 22:43:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@isi.co.jp) Received: by ns.isi.co.jp id <21907>; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 13:46:48 +0900 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 13:41:00 +0900 From: john cooper To: grog@lemis.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, mike@smith.net.au, ticso@cicely.de Subject: SCSI vs. DMA33.. Cc: john@isi.co.jp Message-Id: <98Nov11.134648jst.21907@ns.isi.co.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Just wondering if anyone has any _objective_ opinion on the performance of say wide SCSI2 vs. DMA33 IDE drives [running on contemporary motherboards]. The theoretical throughputs of 40MBs and 33MBs don't tell me a whole lot. I know SCSI was the choice for performance in the past, however I'm curious what others are seeing in actual usage these days. Thanks, -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message