Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 00:21:11 +0300 From: abi <abi@abinet.ru> To: Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com>, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current State of drm-next? Message-ID: <7e0cc526-f41c-c85f-4bcf-3eabdd731025@abinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20171003194624.GC19024@rancor.immure.com> References: <20171003194624.GC19024@rancor.immure.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03.10.2017 22:47, Bob Willcox wrote: > This may have been beaten to death, and I apologize if so, but what is the > current state of the drm-next changes? I have a system that I use for work > every day that is running an Intel Broadwell CPU and using the internal GPU. > Currently I am using the freebsd-base-graphics source (git cloned) from Jun > 13th, but am quite anxious to be able to go back to running current from head. > > So, what is the current state of the changes and/or prognosis of when it will > be sufficient to get support for the Broadwell GPU simply by running current? > > I've read a bunch of stuff about this, but I'm not sufficiently confident in > my understanding or what I've read to risk breaking my critical workstation. > > Thanks for any pointers or info on this, > Bob > Experimental port was made to run on CURRENT http://www.freshports.org/graphics/drm-next-kmod/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7e0cc526-f41c-c85f-4bcf-3eabdd731025>