From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 30 08:42:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7909FB30; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail-n.franken.de", Issuer "Thawte DV SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 376A02EBB; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (p508F3F42.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.143.63.66]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DDB1C104DBB; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:42:19 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r266083 - in head/sys/arm: arm include From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:42:18 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9B438991-C970-46A7-8116-A490E02D7139@fh-muenster.de> References: <201405141911.s4EJBFZZ097826@svn.freebsd.org> <537D0952.2040001@selasky.org> <7610C8E6-3F01-4317-BC1A-67645A162CD7@FreeBSD.org> <53871493.2010502@selasky.org> <9412A358-EBCB-4A5A-B728-2A15C50FC217@fh-muenster.de> To: Mark R V Murray X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Cc: Hans Petter Selasky , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:42:24 -0000 On 29 May 2014, at 21:21, Mark R V Murray wrote: >=20 > On 29 May 2014, at 19:27, Michael Tuexen = wrote: >=20 >> On 29 May 2014, at 20:15, Mark R V Murray wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 29 May 2014, at 19:13, Michael Tuexen = wrote: >>>=20 >>>>> I can make it work on RPI, but trying to find what else it = will/won=92t work on is more problematic. >>>> Wouldn't it require to use different registers on the RPI? This = would mean you >>>> would need more #ifdefs=85 >>>=20 >>> Thats the problem; too many #ifdefs. >> So you could just keep the code for now, but reduce the #ifdefs to = the ones you >> know that work. Later on, you can replace it by the driver stuff=85 >=20 > That=92s what I was thinking, yes. Great. Let me know if you need testing support on the RPI... Best regards Michael >=20 > M > --=20 > Mark R V Murray >=20 >=20