Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:30:21 -0500
From:      Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc:        Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com>, Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
Subject:   Re: Question about bce driver
Message-ID:  <200707111230.24975.josh@tcbug.org>
In-Reply-To: <4694940D.9050408@tomjudge.com>
References:  <BDD239C660ED0435A14C5A76@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <4694940D.9050408@tomjudge.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart11726335.vzX6NaP99J
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Tom Judge wrote:
> Paul Schmehl wrote:
> > I'm running 6.1 RELEASE (i386) and I've been replacing the
> > if_bce.c file with a slightly newer one that at least got the
> > driver working without hard lockups that required a reboot to
> > fix.  (Rather problematic on a remotely located web server.)
> >
> > If I download the latest driver from cvs (1.33), should I also
> > replace the if_bcefw.h and if_bcereg.h files with the newer
> > versions?  Will the NIC work without creating new problems?=20
> > Right now I get an occasional "flapping" of the NIC link state
> > (down, up , down, up, etc.) but it at least works most of the
> > time.  I don't want to buildworld and get suprised by a
> > non-functioning NIC.  :-)
> >
> > If I use the newer versions, will I also need to use some other
> > newer files that are called by them?  Or would it be better to
> > upgrade the entire box to 6.2?
> >
> > FreeBSD www.stovebolt.com 6.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10
> > #2:
> >
> > grep bce /var/run/dmesg.boot
> > bce0: <Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B1), v0.9.6> mem
> > 0xf4000000-0xf5ffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci9
> > bce0: ASIC ID 0x57081010; Revision (B1); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz
> > miibus0: <MII bus> on bce0
> > bce0: Ethernet address: 00:13:72:fb:2a:ad
> > bce1: <Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B1), v0.9.6> mem
> > 0xf8000000-0xf9ffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci5
> > bce1: ASIC ID 0x57081010; Revision (B1); PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz
> > miibus1: <MII bus> on bce1
> > bce1: Ethernet address: 00:13:72:fb:2a:ab
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>  From the testing that I have been doing for the last few months
> the driver in 6.2 is stable if you are not using jumbo frames and
> there is a light-moderate network load.
>
> However if you want to use Jumbo frames the driver is very
> unstable.  I posted a patch against 6.2 which should fix some load
> based issues in the driver with standard frame sizes.
>
> Tom

Paul, I was never able to solve the link up/link down problems with=20
the driver....I was using the drivers from STABLE for a while, and=20
without jumbo frames everything worked somewhat ok most of the=20
time....the ultimate solution was to just get the intel PCI-X card=20
and stop using the broadcoms.


=2D-=20
Thanks,

Josh Paetzel

--nextPart11726335.vzX6NaP99J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBGlROwJvkB8SevrssRAmscAJ0X5An4mp97FhO2VUMMw3zacyjj1QCfY1YS
IPUKkRo0P/C5A6gvNkF5NI0=
=xJJD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart11726335.vzX6NaP99J--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200707111230.24975.josh>