From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 18 16:33:44 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA09158 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 16:33:44 -0800
Received: from isl.cf.ac.uk (isl-gate.elsy.cf.ac.uk [131.251.22.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA09134; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 16:33:37 -0800
Received: (from paul@localhost) by isl.cf.ac.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id AAA02811; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 00:33:46 GMT
From: Paul Richards <paul@isl.cf.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <199501190033.AAA02811@isl.cf.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Colorado 250 Tape Drive
To: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 00:33:45 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.sax.de, babb@sedhps01.mdc.com,
        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <29570.790438865@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 18, 95 06:21:05 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 951       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who said
> 
> Ok, would the respective parties involved try to get together on this
> and provide a fix?  I have no problem with disabling this again before
> 2.1R, but I'd like to do it in a more INFORMED way this time!
> Whacking features out of the system based on innuendo and hearsay is
> hardly the proper approach, and some actual proof in concise form
> (like you seem to have finally provided in your last message) is what
> I need to settle this.  Jim says it works, you say it doesn't, you
> see how I might not enjoy being stuck in the middle of this! :-)

Mine doesn't work. I get the same problems with "fdc0: ready for
output in input:" errors during probe.

-- 
  Paul Richards, FreeBSD core team member. 
  Phone: +44 1222 874000 x6646 (work), +44 1222 457651 (home)
  Dept. Mechanical Engineering, University of Wales, College Cardiff.
  Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org,  JANET(UK): RICHARDSDP@CARDIFF.AC.UK