From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 06:46:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3ED106566B; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from hosted.kievnet.com (hosted.kievnet.com [193.138.144.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C58B8FC1F; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=edge.pp.kiev.ua) by hosted.kievnet.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1JovE7-000HAg-7V; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:46:39 +0300 Message-ID: <48102CCE.6020004@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:46:38 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <480E3F5E.3060501@icyb.net.ua> <1208903822.1548.62.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <480F3B39.3090702@icyb.net.ua> <1208957957.58820.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080424080229.114632lxyo7mbi4g@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20080424080229.114632lxyo7mbi4g@webmail.leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: purely package-based/oriented solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:46:40 -0000 on 24/04/2008 09:02 Alexander Leidinger said the following: > Quoting Pav Lucistnik (from Wed, 23 Apr 2008 > 15:39:17 +0200): > >> Andriy Gapon píše v st 23. 04. 2008 v 16:35 +0300: > >>> BTW, strange thing: >>> $ portupgrade -a -PP >>> ... >>> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/linux_kdump: >>> does not build with the default linux base, use the package instead >>> >>> What's this about? :-) I do say to use packages only. >> Guess portupgrade still looks at the ports tree. What happens if you try >> to rm -rf /usr/ports first? > > If someone knows a better way of handling this (using something else > than IGNORE, with the same effect to people trying to build it from > ports but with a better behavior when used with portupgrade -PP), I'am > all ears (a better way of fixing this would be to include preparsed > linux stuff, but there are more important things on my TODO list...). Alexander, I am not completely sure what your question was. My concern is: why on -PP mode portupgrade needs ports at all? Why not just go to package repository and check what you've got there. I do not demand that portupgrade be tailored to my needs, I am just saying that it doesn't meet them. ... maybe if I rename it to pkgupgrade :-) -- Andriy Gapon