Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 10:28:22 -0700 (MST) From: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org> To: jesse@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De, oddbjorn@oddbjorn.bdc.no Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACE 4.6 on -current (still) Message-ID: <199812231728.KAA24942@vip.consys.com> In-Reply-To: <199812231102.MAA17654@oddbjorn.bdc.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greetings, ELF ACE 4.6 works fine (passes all the tests, including netscvs) with the stock cc and egcs 1.1.1 too (modulo a couple of nits). More interesting (to me) though is getting TAO's MT_Cubit test working. The problem is entangled in the posix sched functions, and I am looking forward to trying out the LinuxThread stuff (which appears to have the required implementations) as soon as I boot the end of the year proposals out the door. I think FreeBSD-current is really close. Then it will be interesting to see how FreeBSD's CORBA performance compares with the systems examined in "An Empirical Evaluation of OS Support for Real-time CORBA Object Request Brokers" http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/RT-OS.ps.gz I'm really itching to see how the FreeBSD sched_*(2) stuff affects the comparitive performance, especially the real-time aspects. My config files have evolved a bit from the stock ACE freebsd configs, maybe it would make sense to work together. I've been working with the cvsup'd sources (i.e. TAO-current, FreeBSD-current). I'm also looking forward to an 1836 DLUAN, compiling TAO abuses the heck out of my pitiful P6-200/128MB box :-). Russell To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812231728.KAA24942>