Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Dec 1998 10:28:22 -0700 (MST)
From:      "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org>
To:        jesse@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De, oddbjorn@oddbjorn.bdc.no
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ACE 4.6 on -current (still)
Message-ID:  <199812231728.KAA24942@vip.consys.com>
In-Reply-To: <199812231102.MAA17654@oddbjorn.bdc.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greetings,

ELF ACE 4.6 works fine (passes all the tests, including netscvs) 
with the stock cc and egcs 1.1.1 too (modulo a couple of nits).  
More interesting (to me) though is getting
TAO's MT_Cubit test working.  The problem is entangled in the
posix sched functions, and I am looking forward to trying out
the LinuxThread stuff (which appears to have the required 
implementations) as soon as I boot the end of the year 
proposals out the door.  I think FreeBSD-current is really close.  
Then it will be interesting to see how FreeBSD's CORBA performance
compares with the systems examined in

"An Empirical Evaluation of OS Support for
   Real-time CORBA Object Request Brokers"

http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/RT-OS.ps.gz

I'm really itching to see how the FreeBSD sched_*(2)
stuff affects the comparitive performance, especially
the real-time aspects.

My config files have evolved a bit from the stock ACE freebsd
configs, maybe it would make sense to work together.  I've
been working with the cvsup'd sources (i.e. TAO-current, 
FreeBSD-current).

I'm also looking forward to an 1836 DLUAN, compiling TAO
abuses the heck out of my pitiful P6-200/128MB box :-).

Russell





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812231728.KAA24942>