From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 10:26:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF99DEFE for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9C001838 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4CAQ8Gh077527 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 10:26:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200138] [PATCH] Fixed sthread-specific array allocation conflict incurred in libthr by some foreign malloc libraries Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:26:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: threads X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: yuri@rawbw.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:26:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200138 --- Comment #9 from yuri@rawbw.com --- You keep saying that this patch makes no sense. And it does fix the error message that used to be printed before all the time, and also it does fix the memory leak. How can one reconcile your opinion that "it doesn't make sense" with the obvious positive practical consequences that have pretty good theoretical explanation? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.