From owner-cvs-usrbin  Fri Mar 28 21:16:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-usrbin>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA09285
          for cvs-usrbin-outgoing; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 21:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA09280;
          Fri, 28 Mar 1997 21:16:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id QAA25246; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 16:13:02 +1100
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 16:13:02 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199703290513.QAA25246@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: imp@village.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/apply, et al
Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>In message <199703290434.UAA07444@freefall.freebsd.org> Warner Losh writes:
>:   1.2       +3 -2      src/usr.bin/uname/uname.c
>:   1.2       +5 -3      src/usr.bin/uniq/uniq.c
>
>These two have me worried, so I did a cvs diff -r 1.1 -r 1.2 and I
>got Berkeley SCCS Id changes.  Are these because these came off the
>Lite vendor branch and these diffs are relative to 1.1 rather than to
>1.1.1.2?  Similar things happened in the uniq case too.

Yes.

1.1 is not quite the right thing to diff against.  diff -r CSRG works
better here.  I don't know how to diff against the head of the vendor
branch in general.

Bruce