Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 16:13:02 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: imp@village.org Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/apply, et al Message-ID: <199703290513.QAA25246@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>In message <199703290434.UAA07444@freefall.freebsd.org> Warner Losh writes: >: 1.2 +3 -2 src/usr.bin/uname/uname.c >: 1.2 +5 -3 src/usr.bin/uniq/uniq.c > >These two have me worried, so I did a cvs diff -r 1.1 -r 1.2 and I >got Berkeley SCCS Id changes. Are these because these came off the >Lite vendor branch and these diffs are relative to 1.1 rather than to >1.1.1.2? Similar things happened in the uniq case too. Yes. 1.1 is not quite the right thing to diff against. diff -r CSRG works better here. I don't know how to diff against the head of the vendor branch in general. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703290513.QAA25246>