Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 08:39:52 -0700 From: Waitman Gobble <gobble.wa@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: swapfile question Message-ID: <CAFuo_fxUspphdS3eiX99gzkesDxuZw%2BVbxHbfZj7phEPvr-C_w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <09eab1d4-3dd8-3530-bdbf-b436ec6aeeed@zyxst.net> References: <09eab1d4-3dd8-3530-bdbf-b436ec6aeeed@zyxst.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 6:51 AM, tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> wrote: > Hi, > > In a SSD/amd64/ufs2/freebsd-11 context, which is faster: > > 1. swap as a partition on the ssd > 2. swap as a file on the ssd > > If one is faster than the other, why? To what extent? > > thanks, > -- > J. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Don't swap. 1 and 2 are both slower. I use Warren Block's SSD setup and create swap file, seems to work A-OK. http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/ -- Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 650-621-0423
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFuo_fxUspphdS3eiX99gzkesDxuZw%2BVbxHbfZj7phEPvr-C_w>