From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon Mar 2 22:40:47 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD9825CA60 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 22:40:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f41.google.com (mail-ot1-f41.google.com [209.85.210.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48WZqL1626z4Prh; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 22:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f41.google.com with SMTP id j5so1007996otn.10; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:40:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iMQXw7D/7Gx/s2LJ6V6B+x22DwYKW4WMlHX+G1WNsKg=; b=CzjskxK9g3s+IF2ecI7VQMmVPGT/riIQzVx6b8TESpmtw+mD6QXj8ZVJnRCsy5jPdT 60TjKTRPbv3EIT2/tJYHs6iInPyU/L6vXjdzRLKiE2SMKEWpYuPJ5w5DdMW1IL6zKuR2 2IWl0+5SUMq8ZYfq9IKhXt9DK0WQe9z+8uOVMVxzDqgRXoohhLPdl2DY/F0sVWb9l62b ll1RnkggwutiCUyddIjyfozpy+KsHhOTMl3YQP9PtB9kZsPuM99+56ihRKEdqEQoSjIq NIsIwIlwW9vt8euZsnXIk2fwmhgdjAslyHd+7CTrx+BxToNoas+UPCTgvHxHg/nSUXz2 CyFw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3i4S0pl7S7cQc0SP8Z+zCiFDnyMEnvbFQJ4iHxUGiHAk+qP3uG jNwgcbpKNikXhVJAJwGZ5epNIjG/VoNxjPNkxOc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuzvv8p5MgJBlKdSzsQPcDmatbgF2+O9ewFBj+gjRVzZAM6RPG+dso4JCQYM8Q3JjXmBshQE4lTFdv89eM6M/4= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:906:: with SMTP id 6mr1035472otp.251.1583188843794; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:40:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Alan Somers Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:40:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: go build, flock, and NFS_BADSEQID To: Rick Macklem Cc: freebsd-fs , Rick Macklem X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48WZqL1626z4Prh X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of asomers@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=asomers@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.02 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[41.210.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.18]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[41.210.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.02)[ip: (-0.43), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.99), asn: 15169(-1.66), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 22:40:47 -0000 Is that a mount option? Because it seems like I can't set it with "mount -u". Do I need to completely unmount first? On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 3:28 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > Try "minorversion=1". The seqid stuff is NFSv4.0 specific and shouldn't > be broken, but NFSv4.1 fixed all this in better ways. > > rick > > ________________________________________ > From: alan somers > Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 2:31 PM > To: freebsd-fs > Cc: Rick Macklem > Subject: go build, flock, and NFS_BADSEQID > > I'm trying to build a Go project with /usr/home mounted with NFSv4. The > server is running 12.0-RELEASE and the client is running 12.1-RELEASE. But > the build reliably fails because flock(2) returns EACCES. Dtrace shows the > cause is nfsrpc_advlock returning NFS_BADSEQID. This sounds like an NFS > bug (server, client, or both? I'm not sure). I'm not an NFS expert. Is > this something I should pursue, and would somebody please give me advise on > how to debug further? > -Alan >