Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:22:13 GMT
From:      Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Pritchard <mpp@mppsystems.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: cputype=486
Message-ID:  <20010312.18221300@ler-freebie.iadfw.net>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010312101239.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <XFMail.010312101239.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Not in the log I posted.  isatty is NOT that large, so what ever this is, 
is after isatty in the executable. 

I wonder if something forgot to pick up the /usr/obj libraries, since the 
HOST system *IS* compiled with -march=pentiumpro. 

This is valid, isn't it? (to compile on one box, and install on another 
with DIFFERENT /etc/make.conf settings)? 



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 3/12/01, 12:12:39 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote regarding Re: 
cputype=486:


> On 12-Mar-01 Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > * Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> [010312 05:53]:
> >> * Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> [010312 02:35]:
> >> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:31:35AM -0600, Mike Pritchard wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Somewhat.  I have a box that has one of those overdrive chips in it, but
> >> > > it still claims to be a 486-class machine.  It runs current, however,
> >> > > and
> >> > > not stable.  Actually, I have two of those machines.  One is running a
> >> > > 12 hour old -current.  The other is running a 4.0-current from 10/24/99.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'll try upgrading the oldest machine to -stable and doing a "make
> >> > > world"
> >> > > and see what happens.  This may take most of the week, since a make
> >> > > world
> >> > > takes forever on one these machines, and my free time to check up on
> >> > > this is
> >> > > very limited.  If anyone else has a true 486 running -stable and wants
> >> > > to follow up on this, feel free.
> >> >
> >> > Okay - whatever you can do to check. Thanks.
> >> I last built the 486 on 2/18/2001, if that helps narrow down
> >> what commit(s) broke it.
> >>
> >> Larry
> >
> > Here is a gdb of strip starting.  I suspect the cmova is an illegal
> > 486 instruction ...
> > Cut from below:
> > 0x804fd7a <isatty+1638>:      cmova  0x8(%ebp),%eax

> It is, it's only on pentium-pro's and later.  Were any of the libraries 
or
> compilers, etc. compiled with a bogus CPUTYPE?  I'm pretty sure isatty is 
in
> one of the libraries, libc even.

> --

> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
> PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010312.18221300>