Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:22:13 GMT From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Pritchard <mpp@mppsystems.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cputype=486 Message-ID: <20010312.18221300@ler-freebie.iadfw.net> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010312101239.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <XFMail.010312101239.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Not in the log I posted. isatty is NOT that large, so what ever this is= ,=20 is after isatty in the executable.=20 I wonder if something forgot to pick up the /usr/obj libraries, since th= e=20 HOST system *IS* compiled with -march=3Dpentiumpro.=20 This is valid, isn't it? (to compile on one box, and install on another = with DIFFERENT /etc/make.conf settings)?=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 3/12/01, 12:12:39 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote regarding = Re:=20 cputype=3D486: > On 12-Mar-01 Larry Rosenman wrote: > > * Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> [010312 05:53]: > >> * Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> [010312 02:35]: > >> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:31:35AM -0600, Mike Pritchard wrote: > >> > > >> > > Somewhat. I have a box that has one of those overdrive chips i= n it, but > >> > > it still claims to be a 486-class machine. It runs current, ho= wever, > >> > > and > >> > > not stable. Actually, I have two of those machines. One is ru= nning a > >> > > 12 hour old -current. The other is running a 4.0-current from = 10/24/99. > >> > > > >> > > I'll try upgrading the oldest machine to -stable and doing a "m= ake > >> > > world" > >> > > and see what happens. This may take most of the week, since a = make > >> > > world > >> > > takes forever on one these machines, and my free time to check = up on > >> > > this is > >> > > very limited. If anyone else has a true 486 running -stable an= d wants > >> > > to follow up on this, feel free. > >> > > >> > Okay - whatever you can do to check. Thanks. > >> I last built the 486 on 2/18/2001, if that helps narrow down > >> what commit(s) broke it. > >> > >> Larry > > > > Here is a gdb of strip starting. I suspect the cmova is an illegal > > 486 instruction ... > > Cut from below: > > 0x804fd7a <isatty+1638>: cmova 0x8(%ebp),%eax > It is, it's only on pentium-pro's and later. Were any of the librarie= s=20 or > compilers, etc. compiled with a bogus CPUTYPE? I'm pretty sure isatty= is=20 in > one of the libraries, libc even. > -- > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010312.18221300>