From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 25 10:38:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98494106566B for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no) Received: from smtp.getmail.no (smtp.getmail.no [84.208.15.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CD08FC0A for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:38:21 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Received: from get-mta-scan02.get.basefarm.net ([10.5.16.4]) by get-mta-out03.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0M9B000FO47RUH00@get-mta-out03.get.basefarm.net> for freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:38:15 +0200 (MEST) Received: from get-mta-scan02.get.basefarm.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 112821EA54FD_38ACB8B for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:45:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kg-v2.kg4.no (cm-84.215.134.159.getinternet.no [84.215.134.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by get-mta-scan02.get.basefarm.net (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTPSA id C71FF1EA3109_38ACB7F for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:45:11 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:38:14 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <20120825123814.51800269467f9b66ea2858e7@getmail.no> In-reply-to: <50385D3D.3010502@brianwhalen.net> References: <50385D3D.3010502@brianwhalen.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Cc: Subject: Re: pr amd64/171016 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:38:22 -0000 On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:06:05 -0700 Brian wrote: > I am the submitter for this. I wanted to report additionally that the > image I used was the bootonly image. Netinst is Debian speak, and one of > those was next in the file list, and I erroneously looked at that. > Additionally, if I unselect all options, to do the 9.1 equiv of a > minimal install, I get to 98% of base and it just stops. In addition to your post here, you should submit a followup to the PR. It keeps everything in one place. HTH -- Torfinn Ingolfsen