From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 9 12:18:13 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81C9F490CA for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 510DE742C6 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1euGiJ-0000FK-NM; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:01:31 +0300 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:01:31 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Arshan Khanifar Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance Benchmark for PTI (aka Meltdown mitigation) Message-ID: <20180309120131.GA38546@zxy.spb.ru> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:18:13 -0000 On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:04:11PM -0500, Arshan Khanifar wrote: > Executive Summary: > - The PTI feature increases the system call times by more than 100%. > - As a macrobenchmark, buildworld was used. Wall clock and user time > showed no statistically-significant changes, while system time > increased by less than 5%. > > This email contains the results for benchmarking the performance of the > PTI patch on FreeBSD 12-current. As a microbenchmark, timing of > getppid(2) system call was used, and as a macrobenchmark, a number of > buildworld tasks were timed. > Can you also run pre-patched kernel?