From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 20 23:10:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5AA16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:10:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3708543D55 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:10:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius.nuennerich@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2005 23:10:23 -0000 Received: from pD9E5FD64.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO olaf.hackerzberg.dyndns.org) [217.229.253.100] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 21 Mar 2005 00:10:23 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5707313 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:10:22 +0100 From: Marius =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FCnnerich?= To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050321001022.15659799@olaf.hackerzberg.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200503201929.aa81393@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> References: <200503201340.07373.mistry.7@osu.edu> <200503201929.aa81393@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Mon__21_Mar_2005_00_10_22_+0100_eb21EhPUJKhqMd9x; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: USB Mouse not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:10:25 -0000 --Signature_Mon__21_Mar_2005_00_10_22_+0100_eb21EhPUJKhqMd9x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:29:18 +0000 Ian Dowse wrote: > BTW, before adding more workarounds here it would be worth reading: >=20 > http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/HID1_11.pdf >=20 > I don't know if this is true, but I suspect the main problem is > that we are simply ignoring the information in the report descriptor > that says how to interpret the data coming from the mouse. Can > somebody check if this is the case, or if these mice really need > special case workarounds? I didn't read the whole document, but as far as I understand the table on the bottom of page 61 (of the document, not the pdf-file) it is clear how the data should be interpreted, and that my mouse (like the intellimouse) is not conforming to this standard. But the interpretation of the data isn't really the problem, the problem are the three points described in my last two mails. Anyway, thanks for your time. Marius --Signature_Mon__21_Mar_2005_00_10_22_+0100_eb21EhPUJKhqMd9x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCPgLeFqu2z7AvZZQRAlhSAJwOcvpi+UG+wkaZrqxoXk4zVVegMgCgndEo 9wYae+f3HIvXkdFApjyuq4Q= =OIYd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__21_Mar_2005_00_10_22_+0100_eb21EhPUJKhqMd9x--