From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 21:30:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C9E16A419 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 21:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB3313C45B; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 21:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <477EA57B.2020402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:30:35 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: josh.carroll@gmail.com References: <200710171228.39123.mistry.7@osu.edu> <4777942D.9010209@FreeBSD.org> <20071230205519.GL73834@redundancy.redundancy.org> <477817E1.7010409@FreeBSD.org> <20071230233017.GM73834@redundancy.redundancy.org> <477AAD89.2000808@FreeBSD.org> <477E96D2.30202@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0801041246m44641e45n997406e89962a06f@mail.gmail.com> <477E9DA9.7000404@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0801041305h10ed5334x9abd89ab5ff3a227@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0801041305h10ed5334x9abd89ab5ff3a227@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David E. Thiel" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_7 jerky mouse and skipping sound (still a problem -BETA3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:30:39 -0000 Josh Carroll wrote: >> The problems I am currently interested in are people who have not found >> an acceptable workaround for their performance problems :) > > Ok, good point. :) And I guess we should assume that anyone who is > still having the problem has not had success with any of the > workarounds. I guess ideally, out-of-the-box, either with GENERIC or > GENERIC with SCHED_ULE, they should not see jerkiness, and if they do > they should report it here. Yes. >> There are outstanding reports of people for whom (as I understand it) >> neither scheduler performs well on UP 7.0 systems when running X, >> compared to the same version of X on 6.x. i.e. there seems to be some >> kind of regression that we need to understand and then fix. > > Ahh, I'm running SMP here, so that could certainly be part of the > reason just using sysmouse worked for me. Although I personally would > like to know why it's jerky when using psm0, and perhaps it might help > someone with a UP setup? If so, would the schedgraph info be useful? > If not, I'll butt out and let someone who's still having the problem > chime in. :) It might be, but it is just as likely to be something else. Kris