From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Sep  4 20:16:37 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA16993
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 20:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA16988
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 20:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA05497; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 20:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: rkw@dataplex.net, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Sep 1996 18:22:23 PDT."
             <199609050122.SAA07805@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 20:06:28 -0700
Message-ID: <5495.841892788@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> It seems to me that resolving to allow someone to implement something
> with the results of the discussion would change that to 1-0 on their
> relative ineffectiveness scores.

Hell, just implementing something would raise the score on its own. :-)

						Jordan