Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 18:28:15 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: julian@ref.tfs.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Route removal on interface shutdown Message-ID: <199604021428.SAA00571@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <1879.828432464@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at "Apr 2, 96 08:07:44 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I tend to go for the "anything that references that interface" set.. > No, we should >never< remove a statically added route. In fact, it is removed, I saw it with iij-ppp inactivity period. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604021428.SAA00571>