From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 5 13:35:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE85A37BCC2; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA72257; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Robert Watson Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: KAME integration and plans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Robert Watson wrote: > > This is great news -- one of the big hangups in our interop testing at NAI > Labs was the like of IKE on FreeBSD. I notice that right now racoon is a > port -- assuming this interpretation is correct, are their any plans to > integrate racoon as a base system component? As you point out, without > IKE, FreeBSD's IPsec implementation is effectively useless for > cross-platform communication due to the number of frobs in SA > configuration. I also look forward to the rapid MFC'ing, assuming that > the code works :-). racoon was not imported because it is still a rapidly changing target..perhaps once development slows down a bit we can import it (NetBSD also have it in ports) Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message