Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:03:16 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: dick hoogendijk <dick@nagual.st>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS Message-ID: <20051103140316.GL63539@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20051103122636.S66191@fledge.watson.org> References: <075001c5dff5$e859fbc0$8adb7bd1@icarz.com> <43693D43.2000400@crc.u-strasbg.fr> <20051103132400.1f983424.dick@nagual.st> <20051103122636.S66191@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dpynvXbW/eW9Tpc3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:27:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote: >=20 > >Sure, but I think it's the *syntax* that matters here? options ->=20 > >nooptions / i486_cpu -> no??? It's OK to leave GENERIC alone, but HOW=20 > >are things switched off? >=20 > It appears to be an ommission in the file format. I've e-mailed Ruslan,= =20 > who implemented nodevice and nooption, to suggest that he also add nocpu.= =20 > I wonder if there are other missed syntactic bits of note. >=20 I've committed a code that implements the "nocpu" directive, FWIW. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --dpynvXbW/eW9Tpc3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDahikqRfpzJluFF4RAvKJAJ41hsYJgGzMx4DTwnET2/FQafVFHACeOYSO yrNDXfz4wwoqw9JjhqhptWo= =7c+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dpynvXbW/eW9Tpc3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051103140316.GL63539>