From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Oct 1 04:05:54 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA03973 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 04:05:54 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA03951 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 04:05:47 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id MAA20960 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 12:05:30 +0100 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id MAA25823 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 12:05:29 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id JAA20358 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 09:29:42 +0100 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199510010829.JAA20358@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: -stable: tuucp1061: tproto, so fast ! To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 09:29:42 +0100 (MET) Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199509301226.NAA10088@keltia.freenix.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Sep 30, 95 01:26:44 pm X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 1065 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk As Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > Watch out, i've experienced SIGFPE's when transfering large files > > simultaneously in both directions. I've reported it to the Taylor > > UUCP list, so i thinks it's on the way to be fixed. > > Did you get them only when using TCP or is it a general "behaviour" of > the "i" protocol ? What are "large" files in your book ? I exchange > news daily (average size 50-150 KB) without problem. I haven't tried to > transfert Xemacs in both ways simultaneously yet :-) I believe it was only over TCP. The problem was a division by the tty baudrate, which could sometimes be 0. Perhaps Andrey can tell more. I'm also getting news via that link, normally without problems. The problems only started when i was getting a large file (e.g. a 50 KB newsbatch), while i was sending a > 100 KB file simultaneously. Sending files only in a single direction always worked. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)